Episode 498Marketing LeadershipBudget StrategyMarketing Analytics

Why your budget tells the truth about your marketing strategy, with Heidi Wurpel

Heidi Wurpel, Head of Marketing at Emburse, explains why a marketing budget reveals strategy in a way no strategy document can: the deck says what you would like to believe, and the dollars say what you actually believe. Prompted by her CEO to look at bookings instead of stopping at pipeline, she backed in from every booked dollar all the way to budget, creating a taxonomy that sliced spend by segment, vertical, channel, campaign, and persona, then mapping percentages of marketing spend against each slice. The matrix came back with goose eggs, line items with zero return, which kicked off the there-and-back-again journey she names after The Hobbit: experiment, go back in, and ask whether each zero is a content issue, a messaging issue, or a channel issue. She argues that startups, growth companies, and market defenders should each see a different story in their budgets, and that the tell is when a company claims one strategy while its dollars act out another, like saying customers are the most important group while the spend does not support the assertion. Because this analysis is for the marketing leader rather than finance or the board, she layers in headcount with good-enough percentages, stays honest about the bias built into her attribution model (first touch flatters brand and PR, last touch flatters email and paid digital), and treats every number as directional rather than perfect. Her starting advice is not to boil the ocean: pick three or four big slices, apply rough percentages, and find your own goose eggs before finance finds them for you.

Heidi Wurpel

Heidi Wurpel

Head of Marketing at Emburse

22 min

Key Takeaways

  • 1Your budget is a more honest strategy document than your strategy document: if you say customers are your most important group, or that you are moving upmarket, the percentages of spend either support that assertion or expose it, and nobody has to tell you which one it is because the dollars already did.
  • 2Instead of stopping at pipeline and saying the rest is sales's problem, Heidi took her CEO's prompt to look at bookings and backed in from every booked dollar all the way to budget, building a taxonomy that sliced spend by segment, vertical, channel, campaign, and persona, then running the same matrix for 2024 and 2025 so the trends showed up alongside the zeros.
  • 3Startups, growth companies, and market defenders should each see a different story in their budgets: startups spend on ICP and persona exploration, growth companies on pipeline efficiency, net-new acquisition, and new markets, and market defenders on share of voice, whitespace, and growing within the existing customer base, so a growing company whose budget acts like a defender's is telling on itself.
  • 4Layer headcount in with good-enough percentages rather than precision, splitting a shared content writer or strategist thirty-three, thirty-three, thirty-three across segments if that is roughly true, because this analysis is for the marketing leader to find aha moments, not for finance, the CEO, or the board, and directional beats perfect.
  • 5Be honest about the bias your attribution model bakes into the data (first touch flatters brand awareness, PR, and organic; last touch flatters email and paid digital), then go find your own goose eggs before anyone else does, because a leader who surfaces a zero-return line item and reallocates the budget looks like a rock star, while a leader whose head of finance finds it first has a problem.

About this episode

Your strategy document says one thing. Your budget says what you actually believe. In this episode of Content Amplified, Heidi Wurpel, Head of Marketing at Emburse, shares how she audited every marketing dollar by backing in from bookings all the way to budget, a journey she frames as "there and back again" in a nod to The Hobbit. Heidi walks through building a taxonomy that slices spend by segment, vertical, channel, campaign, and persona, and what she found when the matrix came back full of goose eggs: line items with zero return. She explains why startups, growth companies, and market defenders should each see a different story in their budgets, how to layer in headcount with good-enough percentages, why you have to be honest about the bias in your attribution model, and why finding your own goose eggs first beats having finance find them for you. If you lead a marketing budget, this episode shows you how to make it confess.

Topics covered

  • Your budget as your real strategy document
  • Backing in from bookings to budget
  • The five-slice budget taxonomy matrix
  • Startup, growth, and market-defender budgets
  • Finding goose eggs before finance does

Notable quotes

And when I had that giant matrix, I found a bunch of goose eggs, a bunch of zeros where I went, my gosh, do we have zero return on investment here?

Heidi Wurpel(01:53)

For me, that was an aha moment of, wow, we're saying that our most important group is our customers. Are your dollars supporting that assertion?

Heidi Wurpel(05:04)

I think you do have to be honest with yourself about your attribution models and the pros and cons of them.

Heidi Wurpel(12:40)

You're not going back to the Shire with the same perspective that you left with, I guarantee it.

Heidi Wurpel(19:22)

Resources mentioned

  • Framework

    The Budget Taxonomy Matrix

    Heidi's core tool is a matrix that slices every marketing dollar five ways: segment (small business, mid-market, enterprise, each split into net new versus existing customers), vertical or industry, channel, campaign, and persona. Against each slice she maps the percentage of marketing spend, then lays booked revenue over the top so every cell answers the question of what went in and what came out. The cells that come back as zeros are the goose eggs, and each one gets interrogated: is this a content issue, a messaging issue, or a channel issue, or is it underperforming because it is underfed? She ran the same matrix for two consecutive years, 2024 and 2025, so the year-over-year trends surfaced alongside the zeros, like a return on advertising spend that swung sharply better or worse. The matrix does not need to be perfect to work; it needs to be honest enough to produce aha moments.

  • Playbook

    There and Back Again: Backing In From Bookings

    Most marketing leaders stop measuring at pipeline and treat everything after handoff as sales's problem. Heidi's CEO pushed her to start at the other end: look at bookings, then back in from every booked dollar all the way to the budget that produced it. The journey out is the taxonomy and the matrix; the journey back is the diagnosis, where you experiment, go back into each zero, and ask what broke. Practically, she leaned on her finance team and her own product's expense-intelligence dashboards for the dollars-out data, then filled the gaps with back-of-napkin work in Google Sheets, and she is clear that a spreadsheet alone is enough to run the whole play. The point of the journey is the perspective shift: you do not come back seeing your budget the way you left it.

  • Framework

    The Three Budget Buckets: Startup, Growth, Market Defender

    Heidi reads a marketing budget against three company postures, each with its own spending signature. A startup budget leans toward ICP and persona exploration, the cost of gaining opportunities, and finding those first buyers who stay happy. A growth budget concentrates on pipeline efficiency, optimizing spend, expanding channels, entering new markets, and net-new acquisition. A market defender's budget shifts to share of voice, total accessible market, whitespace, and retaining and growing the existing customer base. The diagnostic power comes from mismatch: a growing company whose dollars behave like a startup's, or like a defender's, has a strategy conflict that no document will surface but the budget makes plain. Slice spend by customer versus net new within each segment and the bucket you are actually in becomes obvious.

Full Episode Transcript

Ben Ard00:00Welcome back to another episode of Content Amplified. Today I'm joined by Heidi. Heidi, welcome to the show.

Heidi Wurpel00:05Thanks so much, Ben. Pleasure to be here.

Ben Ard00:07Yeah, Heidi, I'm excited. This is going to be a ton of fun. You have the coolest analogy for our subject today. But before we get to that, let's get to know you a little bit. If you don't mind sharing with the audience who you are, your work history background, all that kind of fun stuff. That'll kind of set the stage for today's conversation.

Heidi Wurpel00:24Fantastic. Yeah, is it the coolest or is it kind of geeky? We'll let the listeners decide that in a few minutes. But for the time being, I'm Heidi Wurpel. I'm the head of marketing for Emburse. If you haven't heard about Emburse, it's a very cool company. We go all the way from purchase order through payments, and then we do everything from virtually spinning up a card for you to spend money, get approval to spend money at your company, all the way through your reimbursement of spending, and then add expense intelligence on top of all that. So finance people love us, but others love us too. And yeah, we have some great stuff available for folks.

And I came to Emburse six years ago, and my history's been really the brand side, corporate side of marketing comms. Journalism undergrad with a focus in advertising, and then did my MBA, totally changed my world, and decided to go into technology. For ten years, worked in corporate IT and then came over to Emburse to do SaaS marketing and haven't looked back.

Ben Ard01:25I love it. That's so cool. Well, Heidi, you and I were emailing back and forth about the subject, and you have this really cool analogy. There and back again, the story of a marketing dollar, obviously a play on The Hobbit. How did the analogy come here? Like, let's start there. Obviously you mentioned it's nerdy. I think it's not nerdy. I think it's awesome in every way possible.

Heidi Wurpel01:47Okay.

Ben Ard01:49But how did this come about? Where did this come from? And where did the analogy kind of show up?

Heidi Wurpel01:53Yeah, I think, you know, so The Hobbit was my favorite book when I was little. I read it all the time. And this concept of, like, there be dragons, right? And I was working on, as so many, you know, leads in marketing, CMOs do, a budget. And I thought, I need to go get more gold. I need to go get more money, right? And sometimes I think that can feel like a battle, like a grand epic journey of how do you go, who's with you, who's gonna be against you, what are you going to have to overcome?

And I just sort of started being very geeky and thinking about it almost as like little me with my, you know, sword going off into the world. And I started slicing and dicing my budget in every possible way. So my CEO is absolutely brilliant, just probably the smartest woman I've ever met in my life, Marne Martin. And she said, well, look at bookings. And I did. And I don't think, as CMOs, we often pause and look at bookings because we say, but, you know, the sales team takes it from pipeline on. It's not my fault if it doesn't close, if it doesn't convert. But instead, I backed in from bookings all the way back to my budget, every dollar. I sliced it and diced it by segment, by vertical. So Emburse sells to small businesses, mid-market businesses, and enterprise. We are international, we sell to a wide variety of industries and a variety of personas. And so as you can imagine, it's like a grand matrix of data that I did. I just created taxonomy and started slicing and dicing every single booked dollar by size, industry, channel, campaign. Let's see, any other ways? Persona, I think I went as well, and then took the dollar spend as well as I could and started doing percentages of our marketing spend against each of those. And when I had that giant matrix, I found a bunch of goose eggs, a bunch of zeros where I went, my gosh, do we have zero return on investment here? And so that really became the there and back again.

And then if we experiment and we go back in, is this a content issue? Is this a messaging issue? Is this a channel issue? Can I explain this? It just opened up this world of thoughts. And, Ben, of course, that's where you and this podcast came in. Like it's a meaty topic that I think others might benefit from.

Ben Ard04:21I love it. I think that's so cool. I love the journey. I love, like you said, you went and you found the end result that you were looking for. You went back to the source and said, wait a minute, maybe these two things don't line up how I originally thought they would. Now, when we're looking at it, obviously when you're looking at marketing strategy, one of your points here is that looking at your budget is actually more indicative of your strategy more than like the strategy document you may have created, or any other kind of like thing that you may be focusing on internally, maybe even KPIs. How does your marketing budget actually represent your actual strategy in like the most authentic, genuine way? How does that actually show off what you're really caring about?

Heidi Wurpel05:04Yeah, you know, I think if you think of marketing groups or businesses maybe in like three big buckets, you've got your startups, right? And as a startup, you're trying to find your ICP, you're trying to get those first sales, you're really looking for, I don't know, the cost of gaining opportunities and just can you find those first buyers? Are they happy? Are they staying? Right. Like you've got that on there.

So if your budget is really leaning toward ICP and persona exploration, that's gonna be telling to you. You then I think have this giant, most of us are in this growth or growing, you know, budget phase. This is where you think of things like pipeline efficiency, right? Optimization of your marketing spend, going to more channels. Maybe you're entering new markets. And I think that was an aha moment for me. You're probably also thinking a lot about net new. How do we get new clients, more clients, et cetera? And so you're really looking at that efficiency dollar spend. And then I think, you know, some of us are lucky enough to be the top of the market, right? Where we're defending our position.

And I think your marketing budget shows that strategy of defense as well. That's when you're starting to think like share of voice, total accessible market share, white space, how do we retain, how do we grow within our existing customer base? And if you slice and dice your budget by customer, that's what I did when I said segment earlier, I did customers for small, medium, large, I did net new for small, medium, large. And I think that's really telling to say, you know, are you really working to grow and defend within the customer base you have, or are you acting like a growing company? And so I think sometimes growing companies can act like growth companies or small startups. I think sometimes growing companies can act like those defending their market share, but that's gonna give you first and foremost your strategy. And then you peel it back to more like the tactical strategy.

Are you entering new markets? Have you found a new area that, holy cow, why is the return on marketing investment so great here? And is that a lever you can actually like pour more money into and replicate in other places? So I think that's what you start to find is it whether it's showing you where your strategy can go or where your strategy is.

For me, that was an aha moment of, wow, we're saying that our most important group is our customers. Are your dollars supporting that assertion? Right? Or we're saying that, you know, we really want to go up market or go more B2C. Are your dollars supporting that assertion? And so you don't have to tell anybody that.

Ben Ard07:55I love that. Okay. There's so much there to unwrap.

Heidi Wurpel07:56Yeah.

Ben Ard07:58I love the concept here. There's so much to think about. One of my questions that kind of comes to mind when you're looking at the budget, there's obviously other components other than the dollar spent, right? There are things like headcount, the amount of time, resources, things like that. How do you wrap those all into like an all-encompassing budget to see where those priorities are at? Do you look purely at dollars spent? Do you look at headcounts? You know, like at what level of like actual expenditure are you looking at from the budget perspective?

Heidi Wurpel08:27I think at first I just started with actual dollars out, right? So truly if you gave me first programmatic versus headcount, right? Budget, looking at how much of our spend is actually going to place ads in the market. And so I looked at that first. But I do think that you should layer in, and I did layer in, headcount as well at a certain point. Now that's not always clean. You know, usually you have a content writer or an editor or a strategist, and they're covering every single industry. They're covering every single segment. Maybe you're blessed enough to have a customer-specific marketer really focused or a few focused folks. But again, that's where the percentages come in.

You just say thirty-three, thirty-three, thirty-three. Where are they spending their time? Fifty, fifty, twenty-five, twenty-five, right? This doesn't have to be a perfect science. Again, this is for you to uncover aha moments for you as the leader of marketing. This is not for finance. This is not for your CEO. This is for you to say where am I optimized and where am I speaking and where am I actually acting? So I did layer in headcount eventually, but it wasn't my first go at it.

At first I just wanted to know actual dollars out and levers I could move. Could I pour more money in and essentially get more pipe out? And could it be as simple as that? Some yeses from that, some nope.

Ben Ard09:54When you're looking at this, and I love that you kind of explained that this isn't for the rest of the company or organization. This is not a document you're taking to the board and showing them all this information. It's for you. What format does it live in? Like, where is its home? How do you read it? Is it a spreadsheet, Google Doc? Is it a handwritten note? Like, what have you found to make this really productive for anyone thinking, okay, maybe I should really invest some time and energy here? What are like some elements here that you found to be really good for documenting that and being able to read it yourself?

Heidi Wurpel10:28Yeah, I think, you know, with that whole Hobbit analogy, like you need your dwarves with you. You need those who will tell you

Ben Ard10:33Ha ha

Heidi Wurpel10:36honestly where the spend is. So I really have a great finance team, and I happen to be blessed with an incredible product. So Emburse does expense intelligence. So we're really lucky that we drink our own champagne, as the saying goes.

So I'm able to see analytics dashboards and slice and dice and have people say, you know, the spend of this money went to this event specifically or went to this digital platform. Now that took me really far, and I can slice and dice down and go into specific analytics. But then I also did some back-of-napkin type of things in Google Sheets where maybe you wanted to look at, you know, the headcount, for example, which isn't again the dollar spend out. And Emburse is really good at tracking dollars, but I'm not putting my team's compensation, for example, in there. So I would say it ended up being a mashup then. But you know, it's really nice to have software that shows you the information that you need right at your fingertips, so you're not spending your entire weekend essentially typing in from your finance team what the marketing spend is. But you can, you can. Certainly I think you could do this in an Excel or Google Sheet for sure.

Ben Ard11:50So you definitely have the shortcut, the inside route. That's really powerful.

Heidi Wurpel11:54I do.

Ben Ard11:55So one thing I loved is that you went to the CEO and she said, hey, go look at the end, look at the bookings. Now there's a journey between the spend that, you know, going back to the analogy, there's a journey to connect that data together. And there are human hands that touch the CRM and all sorts of things. Data is never perfect. I've never talked to anyone who said the CRM data is flawless. I love it. It tells me everything I need. Like, not a soul has ever said that once. How did you find your tolerance level for good enough? And how did you start connecting those things? Any advice there? Cause I know a lot of marketers are like, every time I have to touch the CRM or whatever it is, you know, I just get so frustrated because we're not documenting everything we should and all that fun stuff.

Heidi Wurpel12:40Yeah, I think you do have to be honest with yourself about your attribution models and the pros and cons of them, right? If you are first touch, period, right? You're going in and you're saying, then you need to know that there's gonna be a bias to brand awareness and brand activity, right? So PR and AR should be looking really, really good. Organic should look really, really good to you. Any out of house should appear pretty well, you know. That would make sense if you're starting to say, wow, a lot of people clicked that QR code or interacted and saw that. So first touch. Now I go a little more of sort of last touch before going in. And so then that tells you a different story. You're gonna see higher in your email, your paid digital. Of course organic still, I think for everyone, remains a major touch point. And I think it is increasing in a world of AI citations. We're seeing maybe SEO go down, but that shorter velocity of organic intro to actual conversion really, really getting tight. But that's a different episode.

So I think for me, looking at the CRM data after you really nailed down your attribution model, that's where you just know that your budget's gonna be biased. And again, you need to be able to explain things. Numbers can tell any story that you want them to tell. And so what I'm really doing is pressure testing my assumptions here. So again, we use last touch attribution. That made me know, hey, it's gonna be biased to paid digital, et cetera. Again, that's why I started with the actual dollars out to give me that information. So we do have a really complex and excellent operations team. Props to my team and all that they can do in tying the data. But it's never going to be perfect. But again, you're looking for directional things. So find your baseline, get directional, apply some thought to it. Does that make sense? Does that not make sense? It's not going to be perfect. This is directional. Again, why you're not sending this to your board, why you're not sending this to your CFO, but why you might be asking yourself, can we get more here? Am I surprised by any of these goose eggs is really the question. Or am I surprised by an incredible return on investment somewhere? And should I do more there? Is it underperforming because I'm underfeeding it? I'm not giving it enough money. And that's where some of the arguments come that you can use with the others in the business.

Ben Ard15:08Well, and something I've seen, and I love that you're touching on this, I've never seen someone get in trouble for having a goose egg. I have seen people get in trouble when someone else finds out the goose egg and that leader didn't know about it. If the leader is the first one to show up and say, hey, we just spent all this money on this one initiative and we got nothing. It was a waste of time and money. We're moving our budget over here, and here's why. All of a sudden you look like a rock star.

But if your head of sales or your head of finance or someone comes in and says, why in the world are we spending all this money? We have zero return on it. What are they doing over there? All of a sudden it becomes an issue. So I love that you can kind of hedge that and always have that understanding up front and can always be the first one to bring that conversation up.

Heidi Wurpel15:51Yeah. And talk to your people about it, right? Talk to your subject matter experts. Ask them, did you know? Did we do something different? Can we A/B test here? What do you think's going on? Did something shift, market dynamics-wise? Like marketing is often the first to feel what's happening out in the world and the trends. And then, you know, we're that leading indicator of something is not right here or something has changed here.

But in my journey, I entered the market in the recession of the 2000s, you know, the early 2000s. And that was my first career. I worked in luxury marketing. So B2C, I was selling jewelry. Well, I was the marketing person selling for a jewelry chain. And you know, what a time to say you should buy diamonds, in the 2008 recession, right? And e-comm came about. Nobody, nobody thought anyone was going to buy diamonds sight unseen, right? And then Blue Nile came along and started eating everybody's dinner, right? And it was this, we need to do something, we need to do something fast. And who sees that, right? The numbers of traffic, those walking through the door, those checking when you're open. Marketing often sees those early indicators and starts having those conversations. I think something might be changing in the economy here. Why is our buyer looking different than it used to be? Why are our sales, you know, our outcomes, conversions lower than they used to be, whatever it might be. Now, in the end, it was a great store. We ended up even growing during the recession. So I'm very proud of what we were all able to accomplish during that time. But it was hard. It was a hard battle. It was hard won. We had to go old school experiential, event-based marketing to achieve what we achieved. And that was a different way of doing things, right? And so, you know, we went both e-comm and experiential. We did a two-prong strategy. And again, that's because we saw what was coming down the line. And this is 20 some odd years ago, but I think applies to the current world we live in where AI is again moving things for us. The economy shifts. It's good for some, not for others, if we're to believe the economists, right? And so what do you do with that? And where does your persona or ICP sit in that sort of K-shaped economy, and what can you do there as well? And again, your goose eggs are those things that last year were great and this year aren't great, which I didn't mention. I did this for 2025 and 2024 and I looked for trends as well. I mapped

Ben Ard18:23Mm.

Heidi Wurpel18:24it and said, you know, we're performing, our return on advertising spend is way better now. What does that mean? Right? Or it's way worse now. You know, we didn't get the money out of that experiential campaign. What happened there? So yeah, I think that that's really telling as well. So think about your strategy in that way, and the budget will indicate things that might be shifting in the market.

Ben Ard18:47Fantastic. I love that. Heidi, I always like to end with a very specific kind of question. I'm curious if you have any tactical advice for anyone in marketing leadership listening to this episode who is nodding their head during this episode saying, you know what, Heidi's telling the truth. I need to focus and maybe take a little bit deeper look at my budget and see what it's telling me about my strategy, about what I really care about, even if I may not really be focusing on certain elements. Where am I putting the budget? Anything that they can do this week or this month to kind of start down this pathway that you've seen to be really productive in this journey.

Heidi Wurpel19:22Yeah, I think step one, create that taxonomy essentially. Create those slices that you want to see. And don't boil the ocean initially. Find your three or four big slices that you want and just try it. Try applying those good enough percentages you were talking about, Ben, to, well, I think about a third of so-and-so's time goes to this and about a quarter of our paid digital spend goes to that. Or our events tend to attract our upmarket folks. So let's say all events are going 100%. So I'd say that's where you start is figure out your slices in taxonomy, add those percentages in your mind of what you can do, and then again, just be prepared and open to what the data says, and keep that really open mind as to what you're probably gonna learn along this journey because you're not going back to the Shire with the same perspective that you left with, I guarantee it.

Ben Ard20:22Love that. And that's a great way to end the episode. Heidi, thank you, thank you, thank you. This is amazing. For anyone wanting to reach out and connect with you online, how and where can they find you?

Heidi Wurpel20:31Yeah, I'm Heidi dot Wurpel at Emburse dot com.

Ben Ard20:34Love it. And for everyone listening, scroll down to the show notes. We'll have Heidi's contact information right there. Heidi, again, thank you, thank you, thank you. This is amazing. Really do appreciate you sharing this journey with us.

Heidi Wurpel20:46My pleasure, Ben.

About the guest

Heidi Wurpel

Heidi Wurpel

Head of Marketing at Emburse

Heidi Wurpel is the Head of Marketing at Emburse, the spend-management company that covers everything from purchase orders and virtual cards through reimbursement and expense intelligence, which means her own product gives her the spend analytics most marketing leaders have to build by hand. She joined Emburse six years ago after a career on the brand and corporate side of marketing that started with a journalism undergrad focused on advertising, continued through an MBA that took her into technology, and included ten years in corporate IT. Her first marketing job was selling jewelry for a luxury chain through the 2008 recession, where the team grew the business by pairing e-commerce with experiential, event-based marketing after Blue Nile upended the industry. A lifelong fan of The Hobbit, she frames her audit of every marketing dollar as a there-and-back-again journey. She uses she/her pronouns.

Connect on LinkedIn

Continue Exploring

Story Drift Analyzer

Check how clearly your positioning survives across your website, content, and AI surfaces.

Try the tool

Get new episodes in your inbox

Join listeners who get episode summaries, key takeaways, and content strategy insights every week.

Frequently Asked Questions

Because the strategy document says what you would like to believe and the dollars say what you actually believe. Heidi's test is to take the company's stated assertions, like our most important group is our customers or we are moving upmarket, and check whether the percentages of spend support them. She also reads budgets against three company postures: startups should be spending on ICP and persona exploration, growth companies on pipeline efficiency and net-new acquisition, and market defenders on share of voice and growing the existing customer base. When a company claims one posture and its budget acts out another, that mismatch is the strategy conversation worth having, and the budget is the only place it shows up honestly.

Back in from bookings rather than stopping at pipeline. Heidi created a taxonomy and sliced every booked dollar by segment, vertical, channel, campaign, and persona, then mapped percentages of marketing spend against each of those slices to build one giant matrix. The zeros in that matrix, her goose eggs, are the line items where spend produced no booked return, and each one gets diagnosed: content issue, messaging issue, channel issue, or an initiative that is underfed rather than broken. She ran the analysis for 2024 and 2025 so trends showed up too, and she layered in headcount later using good-enough percentages for how shared people split their time. Her advice for getting started is not to boil the ocean: pick three or four big slices, apply rough percentages, and stay open to what the data says.

Start by being honest about the bias your attribution model creates. First-touch attribution flatters brand awareness, PR, and organic; last-touch attribution, which Heidi uses, flatters email and paid digital, so she knew going in which way her budget data would lean. From there, treat everything as directional rather than perfect: find your baseline, apply some thought, and pressure-test your assumptions instead of chasing flawless numbers, because numbers can tell any story you want them to tell. This is also why the analysis stays with the marketing leader rather than going to the board or the CFO; it exists to surface surprises, like an unexpected goose egg or an unexpectedly strong return that deserves more money, not to serve as audited reporting.

Find it first, and bring it up yourself. As Ben puts it in the episode, nobody gets in trouble for having a goose egg; leaders get in trouble when the head of sales or finance finds it before they do, while the leader who says we spent here, got nothing, and are moving the budget over there looks like a rock star. Heidi's next step is to take the zero to her subject matter experts and ask what is going on: did we do something different, can we A/B test here, did market dynamics shift. She also distinguishes broken from underfed, since a line item can underperform because it never got enough money to work, and she watches for goose eggs that were strong last year and collapsed this year, because marketing is often the first function to feel a market shift, the way her jewelry-chain team felt the 2008 recession and Blue Nile's rise before anyone else did.

EP 49720 min

How to build a marketing team when you're the first hire, with Bronwyn Pope

with Bronwyn Pope

Being the first marketing hire at a company means the strategy, the budget, and the doing all land on you at once. In this episode of Content Amplified, Bronwyn Pope, Vice President of Marketing & Communications at St. Croix Hospice, shares what she learned doing it twice: first at Special Olympics Minnesota about 20 years ago, then at St. Croix Hospice, where she joined as the first marcomm hire eight years ago. She walks through her first 90 days, including handing a graphic designer $3,000 and asking for a year's worth of templates so one person could look like a whole department. She explains how she justified her first hires by targeting roles that would pay for themselves immediately, why she loves hiring people smarter than she is, and the question she asks everyone on her team: what is the job you want eventually? She also tells the story of how letting people pivot across the team turned a front-desk employee with a law enforcement degree into her head of internal communications. If you are building a marketing function from scratch, or leading one through fast growth, this episode maps the road ahead.

August 13, 2026Listen
EP 49120 min

How to get your marketing team out of the execution trap, with Melissa Geertz

with Melissa Geertz

Marketing teams do not fall into the execution trap because they are bad at their jobs. They fall in because they are so good at executing that every request lands on their desk. Melissa Geertz, Senior Vice President of Marketing at Gray, joins Content Amplified to explain why most organizations only tap a fraction of marketing's expertise and what it takes to climb out. She breaks down how a broad skill set turns marketing into the company catch-all, why measuring sales quantitatively and marketing qualitatively creates an unintentional divide, and how a shared services model amplifies all of it. Her structural fix is a dedicated business-facing role that thinks and acts like an account executive, not to do the work, but to be the bridge that unlocks the rest of the team. If your team is stuck taking orders, this conversation gives you the first move and the patience to make it stick.

July 29, 2026Listen

Get new episodes in your inbox

Join listeners who get episode summaries, key takeaways, and content strategy insights every week.