Episode 482AI in MarketingCreative OperationsMarketing Leadership

Why AI's do-more pressure is burning out creative teams, with Karen Cooper

Karen Cooper, Director of Marketing, Content Experience at Wolters Kluwer Health, joins Content Amplified to talk about what the AI-driven pressure to do more is actually costing creative teams. She is unambiguous that AI is the genesis of that pressure, which arrives top down in a large company: her team has not been asked to cut headcount, but it has been asked to increase the volume of output, and the question she keeps forcing back into the conversation is whether that volume really moves the needle, or whether it would be better to slow down, take more time on brainstorming and strategy, and treat AI as enablement rather than the end result. Ahead of her talk at B2B Ignite, she has been running LinkedIn polls with marketing peers, and the results surprised her twice: when teams are asked to do more quickly, the first thing sacrificed is not creative quality but priority clarity, because in a shared services model everybody thinks their project is the top priority, and the hardest part of maintaining A plus work is not a lack of creative time, which scored lowest, but last-minute requests, an expectation AI has inflated because people assume you can just prompt something in two seconds. She cites a Superside breakpoint report line that stuck with her, that we are creating a new kind of burnout and it is a human problem, not a technology problem, and describes her response as a leader: planning and process alignment, leaning on partner teams to do the legwork and clarify priorities before work reaches her team, pushing back when stakeholders want more output than the people she has can produce, and protecting her team's wellbeing. She also explains how to keep creative people from becoming order takers by getting content and creative leads into planning discussions early, admits her team never gets to three-month thinking because everything happens in the moment, and shares the counterpoint of her husband's outdoor adventure apparel company, which differentiates on all-human, no-AI design. Her bottom line names the whole episode: it does not mean we should do it just because we are capable of doing more, but at what cost.

Karen Cooper

Karen Cooper

Director of Marketing, Content Experience at Wolters Kluwer Health

21 min

Key Takeaways

  • 1AI is the genesis of the do-more pressure, and it arrives top down. Karen is fully convinced AI created the current pressure on creative teams, driven from the top of large companies by how fast the industry and market are moving and by competition over who has the best AI product and tool. Her team has not been asked to reduce headcount, but it has been asked to increase the volume of output with the same small number of writers and designers. The question she keeps raising in response: is that volume really moving the needle, or would it be better to slow down, take a little more time on the brainstorming and strategy side, and use AI as enablement rather than the end result?
  • 2Priority clarity, not creative quality, is the first thing sacrificed. Karen's first LinkedIn poll ahead of B2B Ignite asked what gets sacrificed first when you are asked to do more quickly in a shorter time frame: process efficiency, creative quality, employee wellbeing, or priority clarity. She fully expected creative quality to win, given who her audience is. Priority clarity won instead, and she recognized why immediately: with volume comes the fight over whose project matters most, and in a shared services team everybody thinks their project is the top priority, but not everybody can have it.
  • 3Last-minute requests, inflated by AI expectations, are the biggest threat to A plus work. Her latest poll asked what is the hardest part about maintaining A plus work when everything is moving fast, and last-minute requests beat rework, bottlenecks, and not enough creative time, which was actually the lowest scoring answer. She ties the trend directly to AI, because people now assume you can just prompt something in two seconds and hand it over. The knock-on effect is that quarterly planning breaks down: her team can plan days in advance with the headcount it has, but it also has to stay nimble for hot requests because the market dictates it.
  • 4The burnout is a human problem, and leaders have to respond like it. Karen cites a Superside breakpoint report that says we are creating a new kind of burnout, and that it is a human problem, not a technology problem. Her response as a leader is concrete: planning and process alignment, leaning on partner teams to do the legwork before work arrives and to test whether their priorities align with company, CEO, and market priorities, and personally pushing back to say you cannot get any more output out of the people we have, even using the tools at our disposal, so stakeholders need to put their eggs in the right basket. Underneath it is an emotional foundation she names plainly: she does not want her team to feel burned out, and she does not want to be a burned-out leader herself.
  • 5Creative people are becoming order takers, and being capable of more does not mean you should do more. Karen has worked to get her lead content marketer and lead creative director into discussions with planning people early, so they absorb the strategy even if they say nothing on the calls and can come back recommending the asset that best explains the idea, an infographic, a full academic white paper, whatever fits, instead of just taking orders. Her team has never fully made that shift, because the churn never pauses long enough for even a two or three hour creative brainstorm, and as she puts it, we never get to three months because we are doing things in the moment. Her closing line carries the whole episode: it does not mean that we should do it just because we are capable of doing more, but at what cost.

About this episode

Everyone in marketing has been told to do more with AI, but almost nobody is asking what that volume actually costs. In this episode, Karen Cooper, Director of Marketing, Content Experience at Wolters Kluwer Health, shares what she is learning from the LinkedIn polls she is running ahead of her talk at B2B Ignite. The results surprised her: when teams are pushed to move faster, the first thing sacrificed is not creative quality, it is clarity on priorities, because in a shared services team everybody thinks their project is the top priority. And the biggest threat to A plus work is not a lack of creative time, it is last-minute requests, an expectation AI has inflated because people assume anything can be prompted in two seconds. Karen explains why the do-more era is creating what a Superside breakpoint report calls a new kind of burnout, a human problem rather than a technology problem, how to keep creative people from becoming order takers by getting them into planning discussions early, and why leaders have to push back when volume stops moving the needle. If you lead a creative team in the AI era, this conversation puts words to the strain you are feeling, and offers a way through it.

Topics covered

  • AI as the genesis of top-down do-more pressure on creative teams
  • LinkedIn poll data: priority clarity is the first thing sacrificed
  • Last-minute requests as the biggest threat to A plus work
  • A new kind of burnout: a human problem, not a technology problem
  • Moving creative teams from order takers to strategic partners

Notable quotes

Everybody thinks their project is priority, but with shared services, not everybody can have a top priority.

Karen Cooper(08:04)

They said we're creating a new kind of burnout. It's a human problem, not a technology problem at this point.

Karen Cooper(10:19)

It does not mean that we should do it just because we are capable of doing more, but at what cost. And even if the work isn't what suffers, it still again goes back to your people.

Karen Cooper(15:54)

And that's the thing, we never get to three months because we're doing things in the moment.

Karen Cooper(19:01)

Resources mentioned

  • Framework

    The Two-Poll Diagnosis: What Do-More Pressure Actually Breaks

    Karen's LinkedIn polls, run ahead of her B2B Ignite talk, give leaders a sharper diagnosis than the usual burnout conversation. Poll one asked what gets sacrificed first when a team is asked to do more quickly in a shorter time frame, with options of process efficiency, creative quality, employee wellbeing, and priority clarity. Priority clarity won, against her expectation of creative quality, because volume creates a fight over whose project matters most and a shared services team cannot give everyone the top slot. Poll two asked what is the hardest part about maintaining A plus work when everything is moving fast, and last-minute requests beat rework, bottlenecks, and not enough creative time, which scored lowest. Run the same two questions on your own team before buying another tool: the answers tell you whether your real problem is capacity or clarity.

  • Playbook

    The Shared Services Leader's Push-Back Playbook

    Karen's response to top-down volume pressure has four moving parts. First, planning and process alignment, so the team can plan its days in advance with the headcount it has while staying nimble for the genuinely hot requests the market dictates. Second, lean on partner teams to do the legwork before work arrives: learn their priorities, test whether those priorities align with the company's priority, the CEO's priority, and the market's, and insist on clear communication. Third, push back personally as the leader: we have the people we have, and you cannot get any more output out of them even using the tools at our disposal, so stakeholders have to put their eggs in the right basket. Fourth, treat wellbeing as the foundation, because even when the work is not what suffers, the people do, and team morale and mental and physical health deteriorate first.

  • Checklist

    Getting Creatives Out of the Order-Taker Seat

    Karen's fix for the order-taker problem starts with getting the lead content marketer and lead creative director into discussions with planning people early, even if they say nothing on the calls, because absorbing the strategy is what lets them come back and say this particular asset, an infographic or a full academic white paper, is the best way to explain what you are trying to do. Protect real creative brainstorm time, two or three hours where the team thinks about tests and ideas that move the needle in three months, not just in the moment. Carve out space for the team to play with AI tools and return with grounded recommendations, this video tool is worth it, that one does not comply with brand. And keep challenging the team to look outside the industry for practices worth adopting, the challenge Karen admits she has not issued in six months because of the churn.

Full Episode Transcript

Benjamin Ard00:00Welcome back to another episode of Content Amplified. Today I'm joined by Karen. Karen, welcome to the show.

Karen Cooper00:05Thank you for having me.

Benjamin Ard00:06Yeah, Karen, I'm excited. This is going to be a ton of fun. This is a question that everyone is asking in marketing, and I think it'll be a fun discussion. But before we dive into that, the little cliffhanger, let's get to know you. If you don't mind sharing a little bit about yourself or the audience so they know who you are, that would be a great way to kick it off.

Karen Cooper00:25Thank you for having me here. I'm Karen Cooper and I am director of marketing for the content experience team at my company, Wolters Kluwer. We are in the health division and it's been really a crazy ride for the last four years that I've been at the company. I lead a team of designers, motion graphic artists, writers, social media, creator and project management. So we are very much in shared service right in the middle of all the busy product work that we're doing, the program work we're doing, and campaigns. So that's where we've been living big time and growing our marketing function within the health organization.

Benjamin Ard01:07Love it. That is so cool. And this is really interesting. You have a cool perspective. You have such a creative team. You're talking about the roles, the writers, the designers, all of that kind of stuff that really leads us into our discussion today with artificial intelligence. You can't go more than five seconds without talking about AI right now. Everyone is being asked to do so much more than they ever have before. And they're given a $200 cloud account saying, great, they should replace half your head count. Let's go do this. But it is creating kind of a sacrifice or at least a compromise when it comes to creativity. So when you are looking at it from your perspective, are you seeing a push around a volume play versus creative output? And where do you feel like that pressure is coming from? Like, I feel like some marketers feel it, some don't, it may depend on their company, but where do you think that's all coming from? And do you feel like AI is kind of the genesis of that?

Karen Cooper02:04Absolutely, 100% I feel like AI is the genesis of that. And I think, you know, we have a lot of, I think the pressure is, I would say, top down within a large company, especially. And what they're looking at is just our industry and the market and how it all is moving so fast. And we're all competing with each other within this AI space and who has the best product and who has the best tool. It's interesting because with my team, it's more of the how we use AI within our work in order to support our products. And then our products are how do we use AI within the products in such a very sensitive area like healthcare and working with patients and clinicians and how do we advance that responsibly and ethically? And then how do we get more of that message out there faster with the creative teams? And so it's pressure all around from just the environment we're in and it's exciting too. Just to put that in there, you know, it can be kind of a tougher sensitive topic, but I think using AI within for content, for social, for creative and design is really exciting. But we are in this weird space where it is that do more. So thankfully we haven't been asked to have less head count, but we have been asked to increase the volume of output. And so what does that look like and how can I use tools to scale it with the small amount of writers or designers that they have? And then how does that volume, how do we get that under control? Where management is like, you've got to do more, produce more, we need more videos and we need it all faster. And then how do we make sure that that's quality and is that the right choice to do more?

Benjamin Ard03:51And that's a great question to ask right there.

Karen Cooper03:53Yeah, is that volume really moving the needle for us or would it be better to slow down and produce something, take a little bit more time in the brainstorming strategy side and then produce something. You can still use AI tools. You can still do it really quickly and it should be enablements versus the end result.

Benjamin Ard04:12I love that. So you are in this cool position, right? So you're gonna, you're going to be talking about at B2B Ignite. Is that right? And in preparation for this, you have been running a LinkedIn poll to collect some data. Tell me about the poll. Tell me about the results. Like what did you expect versus what you're getting? I'd love to hear this.

Karen Cooper04:21That's right. Yeah. Absolutely. The reason that I applied to speak at B2B Ignite, I got an email. I've spoken at the North America one in Chicago several years ago and I had such a great experience. I think I was the only talk that spoke about the marketer as a person rather than marketing as a function. So everybody's so focused on what we are doing within our basically our discipline and not really the people behind the discipline, which is obviously critical. So I was familiar with their work in their conferences and I was at a team meeting actually, our leadership team meeting on site and just the influx of requests and I was starting to feel that swirl and like it drowned out and I can't even, there's so much volume that it's hard for me to even carve out time to test out fun AI tools which is, that's the exciting part right? Testing it out and trying to decide which ones we're going to use and what application and is it worth our money? You know, things like that. So it was just this perfect storm of do more. I need the creative team to output more. What tools are they using? Is anybody testing this? And it was just this swirl and kind of a stressful situation. And so I started creating this topic that was just in the back of my mind of do more with less. And then how are we, what are we doing to our creative team is when we're forcing them to produce so much more volume of work and then forcing them to use AI tools that they really haven't had a chance to test out, to play around with, to see if it's worth our effort. And how do I as a leader carve that space where they can play around and be able to recommend, yes, I definitely love this particular video tool. This other one did not comply with brand, you know, that sort of thing. So that's where the impetus of this whole talk. And then from there, and I got accepted. And so from there, I started, I was like, man, I need to do some research with my peers and see if anybody else is thinking this way too, and feeling the strain and burnout and, you know, just battling those conversations that we have to have as leaders and managers with our team where they're coming to us like, I can't keep up, I'm so stressed. You know, or even their own personal beliefs. I don't want to use AI. I don't want AI to take my job. I don't want it to hurt the environment. So we're kind of managing quite a bit. The one thing I found very interesting, I've had three polls. And you know, I'm just a small person with a small following. So I've got just kind of a few core votes and so I'm hoping to get more of a data foundation for data. But what really surprised me the very first one, looking over my notes, because I wanted to talk about it today, but the very first one was around what is the first thing to get sacrificed when you're asked to do more quickly in a shorter time frame and it was around, let's see, it was, is it process efficiency, is it creative quality, is it your employees' well-being, or is it a priority clarity and priorities? I 100% thought it was going to be top one creative quality, especially with, you know, like looking at my thought, who my audience is because I was like, oh, it's totally creating quality or they're going to really feel that. But it was actually priority clarity. That surprised me. And I was like, well, I can definitely see that.

Karen Cooper08:04With the volume becomes who's got the top priority. Everybody thinks their project is priority, but with shared services, not everybody can have a top priority. And so that really surprised me that that was the clarity issue of that was number one. And then after that, it's been kind of tied. So the latest one that I have right now is super duper fun and it is about, let's see here where we at. So what's the hardest part about maintaining A plus work when everything is moving fast? And that one, again, a little bit of surprise. It's like, is it the rework, the bottleneck, the last minute request, or not enough creative time? Not enough creative time was actually the lowest scoring in that poll. The top one was last minute requests. That's what, that is what causes our A plus work or our top work to suffer is more constantly getting less and less.

Benjamin Ard08:57Interesting. Do you feel like that's gone up because of AI? People are like, well, of course you can just prompt this in two seconds and give it to me, right?

Karen Cooper09:05I do, so it makes it tough to do. It makes it tough to do quarterly planning because we have to be agile. Social media really is a great example of social media. It's not, you can't plan three months ahead. Things change so quickly. So how do we completely pivot our processes? That's what these polls are kind of telling me. Well, how do we adjust our processes where we've got, we're able to plan because I only have a certain amount of head count. So we're able to plan for our days in advance, but then we also have to be nimble and agile for things that are hot requests because the market dictates it as such.

Benjamin Ard09:42Interesting, very interesting. Okay, so you've got data, you're going to go talk and this is going to be fascinating. I wish I could be there. This is so cool. If they record it, please share it with me. I'd love to see this. So with all of this, what are you kind of coming to as a conclusion as a leader? How are you managing the expectations of output? How are you determining your standard for quality? How are you, like your poll asked, how are you managing priorities for the team so they know what should take time and effort versus other things? How are you starting to internalize this and what are some of your recommendations?

Karen Cooper10:19And that's a great question because I don't actually have a definitive answer. And I don't know if I ever will or will be evolving as we evolve very quickly with AI. And I was thinking earlier today about, you know, kind of the progress of our tool stack anyway, you know, going from, you know, hand drawing or writing on pen to paper, and then we've got Microsoft Word, and we start getting all these tools at our disposal, AI is just yet another tool for us to use. So then how do we look at it in that manner versus it's taking over everything? How do we look at it as, this is my latest tool that I get to learn, and all these companies are, whether they cater to video or content creation or even the strategy and brief creation. So how do we look at it? That's kind of my first step. How do we look at these different tools for due diligence? And I was reading a paper by, I think it's a Superside. Yeah, Superside and it's called, it's a breakpoint report about creative, like what are their breaking points with asking for more AI intervention with the work. And I found it really interesting. They said we're creating a new kind of burnout. It's a human problem, not a technology problem at this point. So if I think about the human problem of my team and what we're asking them to do, for me it goes back to planning, like I just kind of mentioned planning and process alignment, leaning in on our partner teams to make sure that we understand what their priorities are and having them do the legwork before it comes to us. Learning what their priorities are, but do their priorities align to the company's priority, align to the CEO priority, as well as the market priority, and then having that clear communication. It's also going to be critical for me personally as a leader to push back and say, hey, we've got the people we have, you can't get any more. You can't get any more output out of the people we have, even using the tools that we have at our disposal. So then it's like, are you putting your, you know, eggs in the right basket, essentially. Like, are you actually creating the right kind of priority? So that's a little bit of how I'm approaching it. And the foundational piece, surprising or not surprising, is a little bit more of an emotional piece for me. Like, I don't want my team to feel burned out. I don't want to feel burned out as a leader. And I don't want to feel that stress that we aren't delivering what we need to deliver, as well as putting the team's own work ethic in compromise, which is critical of creative teams. We were talking about entrepreneurship, but I have a husband who owns his own company now. He's a designer and an artist. And their company does outdoor adventure apparel. And all of their designs are their own, him and his business partner. And they are artists at heart. So one of the very key differentiators on their website is these are all human, human designs, not AI. They don't use AI. They just use their own pen to iPad, we should say. And they're designing even hand lettering. So for him, it's a conscious decision that he feels like it takes away from his work morals. I guess you should, you could say like his design morals. This is how I want to be a good artist.

Karen Cooper13:44And so then how do we balance that, know, artistry with my team as well as you have five booth graphics to make, we got to get these out today. So that's a long way to say I really don't have any answers other than from my own team we're trying very very hard as leaders, functional leaders, to work on the processes and the priorities and understanding, making sure that they match up with what's going to move the needle. You know, it might be one organic social post, it might take 15 minutes, but we do global work so if we have stakeholders, 50 stakeholders, all wanting a social post and that social person have video, now I've got two people that are going to be busy for the whole week and really did that move the needle, because we spread you guys out to, you know, to fit.

Benjamin Ard14:33Yeah. Well, and I love this conversation. I love the insights and the perspective, and I love that you're bringing data to the table. I love the polls and everything. It used to be, at least from my perspective, that we as a company had to have internal alignment. Like you said, our goals, our objectives, things that we want to do because there was only so much time in the day to get certain things done. So we needed to focus on the most productive ones that were going to hit the company KPIs. Not that everyone felt this way, but I think in general, people agree it gave us permission to say no to certain things that didn't line up with the overall priorities. And I feel like overnight, you mean, and not really, you know, it's been like three years, but in the grand scheme of things, that feels like overnight. It shifted where we still need the same level of internal alignment and company objectives, but it's no longer priorities because we don't have the resources. It's priorities because we can do so much, but we still have to do the right stuff. And it's interesting to see how you've been talking about that and how that really does come through. And so there's still this whole goal and objective of gotta have conversations with people. Gotta actually know what we're doing. We gotta be aligned. We gotta build towards priorities. We got to do what's right regardless of how many tools we have. It doesn't mean we should do anything and everything. And I love that.

Karen Cooper15:54I think you said that really well. It does not mean that we should do it just because we are capable of doing more, but at what cost. And even if the work isn't what suffers, it still again goes back to your people. And then you start to really lose your team morale and people's mental and physical health starts to deteriorate. And just that, I feel like it's a little bit different. Maybe I'm biased, but I feel like it's different even with creative people. Because as a creative person, you don't want to have to write on demand within a deadline, but have you ever been like, got to do this in 15 minutes and you're staring at a blank screen? Or I have to, thankfully we're in a heavily branded company. When you work for an agency, you've got a ton of different types of brands and creative in that respect, they get really difficult. Thankfully we have got more of a template-ed approach, but then the output is so high that they can only work within their template instead of really doing probably what we want them to do as creatives and think bigger and what's the next step. And that's something that I challenge my team a lot with is like, what tool is next? What have you researched? What do you see in not even in our industry, but out of our industry? And how can we adopt certain practices out of industry into healthcare from a creative standpoint? I don't think I've challenged them with that in the last six months because it's just been like this churn and burn that we.

Karen Cooper17:20And that's because we need to get AI in our products and we need to get our message out. So I understand the scope of it. I'm just arguing, is that really the best way to deal with creative team members? We think differently, right? Yeah, we think differently.

Benjamin Ard17:33100%. Well, and the added pressure to always be performing and outputting, it takes away the magic. And that is what is what people want to latch onto and care about. And if they're under stress, again, it doesn't matter if it's an AI world or otherwise, if you're not giving these people the freedom to really come and bring their best selves to work, you're only going to get so much and people latch on and see it.

Karen Cooper18:01Yeah, and I think I like getting it to more like order takers. So when I started at the company, I was really trying to get my lead content marketer and my lead creative director into discussions early with the planning people. And even if they don't say anything on the calls, they're absorbing what that strategy is. And then they can deliver to say, hey, I think this particular asset is the best way to explain what you're trying to do. It could be an infographic work, could be a full EVA or an academic white paper, whatever it is. They have that input versus being order takers. We have never made that shift, my team, like we've never, it's been so difficult because of how much we're trying to do to make that shift to say hey, let's pause for a second, I mean my goodness, like two hours, three hours, and have like a creative brainstorm, like an actual creative brainstorm where we think about, you know, even A/B testing and things that can move our needle but like in three months.

Karen Cooper19:01And that's the thing, we never get to three months because we're doing things in the moment.

Benjamin Ard19:06Yeah, 100%. Well, Karen, we have run out of time. This has been a fascinating discussion. Thank you so much for the time and insights. This has been great. For anyone listening who wants to reach out and connect with you online, how and where can they find you?

Karen Cooper19:18I'm Karen Cooper. I'm KC narrative on LinkedIn. So feel free to, you know, connect with me there and please share and vote my polls that I'm going to be posting through June so that I can collect even more information for this talk and try to figure out what is going on and how can we move to the next step.

Benjamin Ard19:38Love it. Very cool. For anyone listening, please feel free to go down to the show notes. We will have the LinkedIn link right there. Click on it, connect with Karen, say hello. Say you came from the podcast, vote in the polls. That would be awesome. Karen, again, thank you for the time and insights today. I really do appreciate it.

Karen Cooper19:54Thank you so much.

About the guest

Karen Cooper

Karen Cooper

Director of Marketing, Content Experience at Wolters Kluwer Health

Karen Cooper is the Director of Marketing, Content Experience at Wolters Kluwer Health, where she has spent the last four years growing the marketing function within the health organization. She leads a shared services team of designers, motion graphic artists, writers, social media creators, and project managers who sit in the middle of product work, program work, and campaigns. A past speaker at B2B Ignite North America in Chicago, where she talked about the marketer as a person rather than marketing as a function, she is returning to the conference to talk about what the do-more-with-less era is doing to the people behind the discipline, backed by LinkedIn poll data she has been collecting from marketing peers. She believes AI should be an enablement for creative work, not the end result. She uses she/her pronouns.

Connect on LinkedIn

Continue Exploring

Story Drift Analyzer

Check how clearly your positioning survives across your website, content, and AI surfaces.

Try the tool

Get new episodes in your inbox

Join listeners who get episode summaries, key takeaways, and content strategy insights every week.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, without hedging. Asked whether AI is the genesis of the do-more pressure, her answer was absolutely, 100 percent. She describes the pressure as top down within a large company, driven by how fast the industry and market are moving and by competition over who has the best AI product and tool. Her own team at Wolters Kluwer Health has not been asked to reduce headcount, but it has been asked to increase the volume of output with the same small number of writers and designers. That raises the question she thinks more teams should ask: is that volume really moving the needle, or would it be better to slow down, spend more time on brainstorming and strategy, and use AI as enablement rather than the end result?

Two results surprised her. The first poll asked what gets sacrificed first when you are asked to do more quickly in a shorter time frame, with options of process efficiency, creative quality, employee wellbeing, and priority clarity. She expected creative quality to win, but priority clarity did, because with volume comes the fight over whose project matters most, and in a shared services team everybody thinks their project is the top priority when not everybody can have it. The second poll asked what is the hardest part about maintaining A plus work when everything is moving fast, and last-minute requests won, while not enough creative time was the lowest scoring answer. Karen believes AI has made the last-minute problem worse, because people now assume anything can be prompted in two seconds, and she is running the polls through June to build a bigger data foundation for her B2B Ignite talk.

Karen refers to a Superside breakpoint report about creative teams and their breaking points with being asked for more AI intervention in the work. The line that stuck with her: we are creating a new kind of burnout, and it is a human problem, not a technology problem. In her team's case the human problem shows up as constant churn, teams forced to use AI tools they never had a chance to test, and creative people producing at a volume that keeps them locked inside templates instead of thinking bigger. She also sees the other side of the tension at home: her husband's outdoor adventure apparel company differentiates on all-human designs, pen to iPad and hand lettering with no AI, a conscious decision he ties to his morals as an artist, and she has to balance that same artistry on her team against days when five booth graphics are due immediately.

Her approach is to get the lead content marketer and lead creative director into discussions with the planning people early, even if they say nothing on the calls, because absorbing the strategy lets them come back and recommend the asset that best explains the idea, whether that is an infographic or a full academic white paper. That gives creatives real input instead of a ticket to fulfill. She is honest that her team has never fully made the shift, because it has been so difficult to pause even for a two or three hour creative brainstorm about tests and ideas that could move the needle in three months. As she puts it, we never get to three months because we are doing things in the moment, which is exactly the pattern she is challenging leaders to break.

EP 48317 min

Why AI should make your marketers better, not replace them, with Mark Boothe

with Mark Boothe

Handing your team an AI tool and telling them to go figure it out fails for about nine out of ten people. In this episode of Content Amplified, Mark Boothe, CMO at Domo, explains how he gets marketers to two, three, even five times their impact: a dedicated AI enablement hire on both the marketing and account development teams, role-specific toolkits (this is what an email marketer uses, this is what the web team uses) installed on each person's machine, and hands-on teaching instead of a company-wide email. Mark shares the story of hiring Jake, whose resume was a custom GPT built to answer deep questions about him, and how that same hire taught a VP of communications with no editing background to produce professional-looking video in a fraction of the time it used to take. He also draws a hard line on AI slop: Google still reigns supreme, mass-produced junk content gets dinged, and with research this easy there is no excuse for lazy outreach. If your AI mandate stops at efficiency, this conversation makes the case for quality and for keeping the human magic in the work.

July 16, 2026Listen
EP 48120 min

Why your content should be infrastructure, not output, with Vanessa Mbonu

with Vanessa Mbonu

The most expensive thing you can make in marketing is an assumption. In this episode of Content Amplified, Vanessa Mbonu, Vice President of Marketing at the NAACP, explains what changes when a team stops treating content as output, checking the box on this week's blog post, flyer, or TikTok, and starts treating it as infrastructure: a strategic system the whole organization feeds, from programming to policy to operations. Vanessa shares the leadership moment that sparked the shift, when her CEO said the organization focused a lot on output and not enough on outcome, why audience-first means meeting supporters where they already are, since they care about voting rights and also watch Love Island and March Madness, and her rule for AI: start with AI or end with AI, but never AI from start to finish. She closes with a tactical playbook: run a skills assessment, use the start-stop-continue framework, automate what a human doesn't need to do, and pick a brand mentor outside your category, whether that's Nike, Beyonce, or Labubu. If your content program feels like throwing things at the wall and seeing what sticks, this conversation shows you the smarter way.

July 14, 2026Listen
EP 48422 min

How to secure your business as AI turns everyone into a builder, with Jeffrey Bernstein

with Jeffrey Bernstein

Turn on multi-factor authentication and you will avoid the vast majority of the attacks that quietly drain business bank accounts. That is one of the blunt, practical lessons cybersecurity veteran Jeffrey Bernstein, founder of Critical Defence, brings to this episode of Content Amplified, recorded as marketers everywhere start building their own AI tools without a security team behind them. Jeffrey has spent 25 years in high-touch security consulting, from ransomware and wire fraud investigations to regulatory compliance, and he argues the attacks have barely changed while the excuse for being unprepared has disappeared. He explains why business email compromise and wire fraud account for roughly half of all the dollars stolen by cyber criminals, how to shrink your attack surface by killing unused apps and updating software, and why third-party vendors are the weak link that sinks even well-defended brands, since you are only as secure as your weakest partner. He gets into deepfakes, the Microsoft-impersonation scams that empty retirement accounts overnight, and why trust moves faster than technology. If your marketing team is shipping its own AI tools, this is the security briefing to hear before you build.

July 17, 2026Listen

Get new episodes in your inbox

Join listeners who get episode summaries, key takeaways, and content strategy insights every week.