Episode 467Content StrategyContent RepurposingAI in Marketing

Make one asset work harder, the Bisquick theory of content with Pat McParland

Pat McParland, VP of Marketing at MetricStream and a lifetime B2B marketer with more than 30 years in business information and technology, joins Content Amplified to argue that content does not need to be as hard as teams make it, and that the answer is getting back to basics and making one asset work harder. She walks through the ABCDE framework she learned at a former company (Audience, Behavior, Content, Design, Evaluation) and explains why so many teams jump straight to design, the video or the ebook, before they have settled who they are talking to and what they actually want to say. She then unveils her own Bisquick theory: messaging is the baking mix, and from one core asset like a survey or report you make the cookies, the cakes, and the muffins, meaning the infographic, the webinar, the videos, and the live event. Content is a program, not a single piece, and you are not done with the batter until everything is baked. Pat calls AI the easy bake oven that finally brings the theory to life, and she leans on Claude daily to turn one asset into many formats while keeping a human hand on the final writing. She closes with two cautions and a focus principle: the medium is not the message, AI can run a stinky process more efficiently but it is still a stinky process, and every team should be able to name its Three Rocks.

Pat McParland

Pat McParland

VP of Marketing at MetricStream

24 min

Key Takeaways

  • 1Most teams overcomplicate content because they get yanked up in the tools and the technology, fixating on the vehicle (a video, an ebook, a podcast) before they have answered who they are talking to and what story they are telling. Pat's fix is to settle the audience and the message first, then decide the format second.
  • 2The ABCDE framework, which Pat learned at a former company rather than invented, runs in sequence: Audience (who are they and what do they want to know), Behavior (what should they feel and do), Content (the headline and three to five key messages, not the finished piece), Design (the vehicle, chosen last based on the audience), and Evaluation (how you will know it worked). Pat's company even ran an ABC before big meetings to plan the room, the outcome, and the format.
  • 3Pat's own Bisquick theory treats messaging as the baking mix and one core asset, like a survey or annual report, as the batter you bake everything else from. From that single asset you make the cookies, cakes, and muffins, which are the infographic, the webinar, the videos, and the live event. The point is that content is a program, not a piece, and you are not done with the batter until everything is baked.
  • 4AI is the easy bake oven that makes the Bisquick theory practical. Pat uses Claude daily to turn one main asset into many formats, prompting it to produce a blog, a social post, a CEO LinkedIn article with a C-level lens, and customer-facing slides while carrying the original tone all the way through. Making content work harder was never a new idea, but the laborious doing of it is what AI finally solves.
  • 5Pat keeps two guardrails on AI. Her content team uses it for grammar checks, plagiarism checks, and first drafts but still writes the final copy by hand, because AI has a recognizable syntax (the one-two-three rhythm, the overused em dashes, the not-only-but-also construction) and self-written social posts earn much higher engagement. And AI can run a process more efficiently without fixing it: it could keep doing a stinky process and just do it faster.

About this episode

Most content teams treat a finished report as a checkbox when it should be the starting batter. In this Content Amplified episode, Pat McParland, VP of Marketing at MetricStream, makes the case for getting back to basics and making every asset work harder. She walks through the ABCDE framework she learned at a former company, Audience, Behavior, Content, Design, Evaluation, and why so many teams skip straight to the design, the video or the ebook, before they have settled who they are talking to and what they want to say. Then she unveils her own Bisquick theory: messaging is the baking mix, and from one core asset like a survey or report you make the cookies, the cakes, the muffins, the infographic, the webinar, the videos, the live event. Pat calls AI the easy bake oven that finally brings the theory to life, and she leans on Claude to turn one asset into many formats. She also offers a caution worth keeping: AI can run a stinky process more efficiently, but it is still a stinky process, so go back to basics first. She closes with her Three Rocks principle for staying focused.

Topics covered

  • Getting back to basics and the medium versus the message
  • The ABCDE framework: Audience, Behavior, Content, Design, Evaluation
  • The Bisquick theory: one asset as the batter for a whole content program
  • AI as the easy bake oven for repurposing one asset into many formats
  • Keeping the human hand on writing, and the Three Rocks focus principle

Notable quotes

So to me, the content is the original content and the messaging is like the Bisquick. And now I'm going to create multiple things out of that. And I like to look at all my content as a program rather than a piece.

Pat McParland(00:02)

I really like to go back to basics because I say, who are you talking to and what is the story first? And then how am going to deliver that second?

Pat McParland(02:35)

You're creating the essence or the best quick at the beginning. And then you're making all these goods based off of it. It works really well. It's worked well for me for 30 plus years, but it works even better now that I have the easy bake oven of AI.

Pat McParland(11:21)

AI could keep doing the same process that you're doing, and it could do it more effectively, but it could be a stinky process to begin with.

Pat McParland(22:46)

Resources mentioned

  • Framework

    The ABCDE Framework for Content That Earns Its Format

    Run content in sequence so the format is chosen last, not first. A is Audience: who are they, what do they already know, are they new to the subject. B is Behavior: what you want them to feel and do, the attitudinal and the action, treated as the outcome. C is Content: not the fully baked piece but the overall headline and three to five key messages, the discipline of summarizing 45 pages of notes down to what actually matters. D is Design: the vehicle, picked only once you know the person, the message, and the desired action, so a mobile video is ruled out for an audience that never uses their phones. E is Evaluation: how you will know it worked, from comprehension to webinar attendance to leads. Pat's former company even ran an ABC before board and leadership meetings to plan the audience, the outcome, the content, the format, and the measure of success.

  • Framework

    The Bisquick Theory: One Asset, a Whole Content Program

    Treat messaging as the baking mix and one core asset as the batter you bake everything from. Start with a foundational asset, like a survey or an annual state-of-the-industry report, that contains your key messages. That report is the Bisquick. Then bake the rest: the infographic is the cake, the webinar is the cookies, the videos are the muffins, and the live event rounds out the spread, with social posts and a CEO article in the mix too. The principle is that content is a program rather than a single piece, so the survey is not finished when the report ships. You are not done with the batter until every baked good is made, which is how you make one asset work harder instead of treating it as a checkbox.

  • Playbook

    AI as the Easy Bake Oven, With a Human Hand on the Writing

    Use AI to make repurposing practical, then keep humans on the final copy. Once the core asset and tone are set, prompt the model (Pat uses Claude daily) to turn one report into many formats at once: a blog, a social post, a CEO LinkedIn article written with a C-level lens, customer-facing slides, and more, with the original tone carried all the way through. Build a company-specific skill for repeatable jobs, the way a teammate built a blog-in-our-company-voice skill so anyone, including product teams, can contribute on brand. But hold two lines. Write the final piece yourself, because AI has a recognizable syntax (the one-two-three rhythm, overused em dashes, the not-only-but-also construction) and human-written social posts earn much higher engagement. And remember AI can run a stinky process more efficiently without fixing it, so go back to basics before you automate.

Full Episode Transcript

Patricia McParland00:02I like to look at the content the same way. So to say whatever piece I have and here's the messages, I can use this content to create all kinds of things. So to me, the content is the original content and the messaging is like the Bisquick. And now I'm going to create multiple things out of that. And I like to look at all my content as a program rather than a piece.

Benjamin Ard00:47back to another episode of Content Amplified. Today I'm joined by Patricia. Patricia, welcome to the show.

Patricia McParland00:52Hey Ben, thanks, it's great to be here.

Benjamin Ard00:54Yeah. Patricia, this is one episode I am thoroughly excited about. There's this whole theory that you're bringing to the table and I'm just hungry for it. Literally figuratively in every way, and form. But Patricia, before we get there, let's let the audience get to know you, your background, work history, all that kind of fun stuff. That way we kind of know who we're talking to today.

Patricia McParland01:18Yeah, it sounds great, Ben. And by the way, you should call me Pat. Whenever I'm called Patricia, I feel like I might be in trouble. So nice name, but I don't usually go by it. yeah, so I'm pretty much a lifetime B2B marketer. I've been a B2B marketer for more than 30 years. And pretty much all that time, I've spent in business information and technology. So I've worked for really tiny companies with fewer than 30 people. And I've worked for really gigantic companies. Like I worked for Dun at Bradstreet, very large company. I worked for Dow Jones. I work for Honeywell, which is an enormous company. And some of my favorite things about that are it's been great to create content messages and go to market with products, whether it's a small startup or kind of a larger organization. The things that I have found is sort of the fundamentals carry through, whether it's a small company or a large company. And that's some of what I look forward to you and I chatting about today, including my famous theory, which I can't wait to unveil with you.

Benjamin Ard02:12I think it's going to be exciting. I love it. Okay. Well, Pat, what we're going to talk about today is make your content work harder and getting back to the basics. So when we say content doesn't really need to be as hard as we make it to be, why do so many teams make it harder than it needs to be? Why have we gotten away from the basics? Why have we made it harder than it should be?

Patricia McParland02:35You know, I think it's a great question, Ben, and you know, maybe for me, because I've been in the business for such a long time, and also because I consider myself a storyteller by nature. One thing about me is I love to read and write. I started reading when I was about four, and then the next year I read like the whole Nancy Drew series, and then I started writing books for my dad. I mean, they're pretty silly books, but I love to read and write, and I always have. And you know, when I think about the basics of creating content, I think sometimes we get yanked up in the tools and the technology. So I need to create what I'm gonna call the vehicle versus the message. I need to create a video, I need to create an ebook, I need to create a podcast. And so very focused on the medium versus the message. I forgot who said that, Marshall McClure or whoever said the medium is the message or I probably have it backwards, but focused on the. I really like to go back to basics because I say, who are you talking to and what is the story first? And then how am going to deliver that second? And I do think that we get yanked up in this, how am I going to create all these different versions of things? it's so complicated. the technology. And I just don't think it has to be that hard.

Benjamin Ard03:47that. That's so cool. And I love getting back to the basics. I love that you're focused on who's the customer. What's the story we're going to tell. And I think that really is the core of it. And it's shocking how many times people will go say we need to create this content, but we've forgotten who we're writing for in the story we're trying to tell. And

Patricia McParland04:04Yeah, and what outcome do we want to drive, you know?

Benjamin Ard04:07Exactly. I love that. So you have a framework called the ABCDE framework. And I love when we're talking about basics, it doesn't get more basic than the ABCs. So I love the ABCDE framework. What does each letter stand for and how does it help us kind of get back to that good foundation?

Patricia McParland04:22I love it, Ben. So this is a framework I actually learned at one of my companies. So I didn't create this, but I love it. I think of it as another something I love is the power of three. So I like three things, know, ABC, you know, easy as one, two, three, you know, sort of like the Jackson song. And, know, I think about this ABCDE is such a simple framework or mnemonic, but it is so helpful. And it goes back to what I just said about going back to basics. So the first A is for audience and. So who are you talking to? So what do you know about them? What do they want to know? Are they new to the subject? Who are they, basically? And then, so that's the audience. That's the A. Then the B is the behavior. What do you want them to do with this message? Do you want them to be excited? Do you want them to come to a demo? Do you want them to purchase? So I think of the B as the outcomes, basically, but it's behavior. And it's kind of a combination of attitudinal and action. So what do want them to feel? What do want them to do? So that's the audience and behavior. Then the content is content not in the fully baked sense, but in the, what are the key messages? So what should this say? And I like to challenge my team members, for example, if they come back to me and say, well, here's my content. And it's like 45 pages of notes. And I say, Okay, summarize this down to, can you tell this story to me in three to five key points? What's your overall headline and what are your three key points? And that's what the content is. So what are the key things that you wanna say to this audience based on what you want them to do, what's the content? And then is the design. And design is where many people like to start. And design is the vehicle. So now that you know these things, and here's the person, here's what I want them to do, and here's what I wanna say. what's the right way to do this? know, okay, based on what I know about them and they never use their mobile phones, you know, maybe a mobile video is the worst way to do it, you know, so, or maybe a long form content will be better based on what I know about the audience, but, or maybe I multiple vehicles, but I like to see the letters, you know, go in sequence to inform the D as opposed to starting and saying, hey, Pat, I need to create a video, you know, which is often how the conversation starts. And then the E, which I think is really important, is the evaluation. How do I know I was successful? So did people understand my message? How am going to know? Can I get feedback on that? If it's a webinar, for example, how many people came? How many people engaged? How many leads do I expect? And that's it. mean, it's such a simple framework, and I love it. so audience behavior, content design, evaluation. That's it. And the thing I love about this simple framework is It works for anything. It works for a conversation or it works for a detailed video, anything. And at the company I worked for, they actually encouraged us to use it before meetings. So let's say you had a big meeting like a board meeting or you have to present to the senior leadership team meeting or something. We would always do an ABC before the meeting to say, who are the people in the meeting going to be? What do want to come out of this meeting? What do I need to make sure that I say in my content? What's the right form for this? Should it be like three slides? Or would it be better for me to do a demo? It's helpful to think through those things. And then E, how do I know I was successful? What's the evaluation? it's simple, but I find it really useful. also like acronyms and things that I can remember, like pity my dear Aunt Sally for math and grade school.

Benjamin Ard07:44Love it. Now to double click on that real quick, going the ABCDE, it feels like maybe that's a little cyclical. Do you often look at the evaluation before you start over for the next piece of content? How does that stage inform the next set of content and the framework moving forward?

Patricia McParland08:02Yeah, definitely. mean, and I'm probably making it sound simpler than it is in some ways. It is simple, but nothing is 100 % linear in life. So yes, I use the E's to say, OK, yeah, how did this one do? What did I learn? What kind of learnings can I apply to the next one? But also, there any, maybe more than one design vehicle, for example, at a time. So I may say, based on this, I want to create a content program. as opposed to a one particular piece. And I would say more often than not, that is the case. So I know if I'm explaining that clearly enough here for you, but.

Benjamin Ard08:36No, no, no, that's great. Obviously, following the framework and then saying, hey, for this particular use case, since we're following the ABCDE, hey, the D might have five different options or something like that. There's different components there for sure. Love it.

Patricia McParland08:46Yeah, yeah, Yeah, yeah. And that's one of my key, that's one of my key things in life and work and marketing is the key message and the content matters more. It doesn't matter more, but it's critical to get anchored on the content and key messages before focusing on the vehicles. I know I've said that a couple of times already, but it's so important. And whenever you're ready for me to tell you my best quick theory, I will, because this is part of it.

Benjamin Ard09:14We're getting there. We're almost there. I just have to apologize. I think you left a joke out there for me to pick up on a while ago and I totally botched it. I apologize. it's one of those moments. We're like, one of those moments where I'm like, wait a minute that, that didn't quite settle. And I don't think I understood what was going on. I love it. Well, Pat, I am excited. We're finally to the bisquick theory

Patricia McParland09:15Okay. What? makes me happy.

Benjamin Ard09:35theory. What is the theory? How does it work? What does this look like?

Patricia McParland09:40So the Bisquick theory, this is my own theory, okay? So we all know what Bisquick is, I hope. So Bisquick is a baking mix, you know, and has like, okay, I don't know exactly what has in it. It's probably secret, but it's got flour, salt, baking soda, baking powder, whatever. It's a foundational mix. And from this mix, you can bake all kinds of things. You can make cookies, you can make pancakes, you can make biscuits, you can make bread. So it's the foundation. I like to look at the content the same way. So to say whatever piece I have and here's the messages, I can use this content to create all kinds of things. So to me, the content is the original content and the messaging is like the Bisquick. And now I'm going to create multiple things out of that. And I like to look at all my content as a program rather than a piece. So if I'm creating, let's say for example, I'll just use a typical example from a B2B. company or companies I've worked for. So a survey, for example, or an annual report. Let's say we're going to do something we've done in my company, for example, is this is the state of the governance, risk and compliance industry. So we'll do a survey with various professionals and say, here's what we learned. So we could stop there and say, that's the survey, there's the report. But I like to use, that's the Bisquick there. Now we're going to make the cakes and the cookies. So the cake would be here's my infographic and then the cookies are the webinar and then you know the muffins are going to be the videos and then the pithy four or something I can't think of more baked goods off the top of my head. But those are going to be the live event that go along with it. So you get the idea. They have the you know it's almost like the bread starter in a way too. You know have the starter and then you're going to use it to make all kinds of different things.

Patricia McParland11:21Once again, I think it seems really simple, but I think it's a fundamental foundational way of thinking about content. Because if you're not thinking of, I have to now make a webinar. now I have to make this. I now have to make this. You're creating the essence or the best quick at the beginning. And then you're making all these goods based off of it. it works really well. It's worked well for me for 30 plus years, but it works even better now that I have throw another little metaphor at you now. now that I have the easy bake oven of AI. So because that really makes it really makes it come to life. So I can tell you how I feel like. Yeah.

Benjamin Ard11:52I love it. Very cool. I love that. absolutely. What I love about this framework is often we are so busy with the idea of creating content. Like you said, you do the survey, you get the results, you make the report and you're like, okay, checkbox next thing. And I love the analogy of Bisquick because you're not done. with the batter until you have made the cookies and the cakes. Like it's all a part of the process. That is what you're actually looking for. And you kind of can't check that box until you say, okay, it's a survey, but it's also a report, but it's also the, you know, social media posts. It's the infographics. It's the webinar we're going to host on this. It's all of these kinds of things. So I love that you're not actually done with the content until you've used every ounce of that batter. think that's super cool. So Pat, let's dive into AI, because that's the next question. with all of these frameworks, with Bisquick and all that kind of stuff, AI is obviously playing a massive role. Where is it helping? Where is it even hurting? Like, what does it do? And how should we look at it when it comes to content?

Patricia McParland12:57So I think it's a great question, Ben. Obviously, I'm sounding like I think every question is a great question. But I think it's such a fundamental question today, because you can't work in a company or work in marketing where people around you are not going to say, what are you doing with AI? And how are you making yourself more efficient and productive with AI? And I think efficiency and productivity is one piece of AI. And it really can help with the. the content actually is very instrumental to the Bisquick theory because if you've created your, you know, your content and your messaging, you know, run through your ABC, it can actually even help you with your ABC and help you think through that thinking. I use Claude the most personally. You know, I've used ChatGBT. I love Claude. I call Claude my best friend. I call Claude Claudy. Claude calls me Patsy. It's a little whatever, but I love Claude and Claude is very useful for helping frame those thoughts, like who is your audience, who's your behavior, who's your content, and set that up. But it's also very helpful for, I have an asset now, which is my main asset. Let's just say it's that report we talked about. How can I now turn this into other things? And I think AI is super useful for that. And you can prompt Claude, for example, to say, this, would like to turn it into these seven things. I want to turn it into a blog. I want to turn it into a social media post. I want to turn it into a LinkedIn article from my CEO with sea level lens. I want to turn it into slides I can share with my customers. I want to turn it into all kinds of cookies, biscuits, and muffins. And Claude is very effective at doing that. Once you've set the original content and set the tone, it can carry that through. I don't want to say it. or he or she whatever, it can carry that through all the way. And I think that's an extremely effective use of AI is to do that sort of thinking of the deliverables. Cautions that I have with AI, and I run a content team, so we use a lot of AI in there for, we use it for grammar checking, we use it for plagiarism checking, and we use it for drafting, but typically, We don't really use it for writing all that much. We might do it for first draft, but then we write it ourselves after that. We'll edit it and put our own human spins on it. Personally, I like to write things myself if I can. I feel like there is a difference with the writing that comes out of AI. It's excellent. mean, would say GPD is a good writer. ChatGPD is a good writer. think Claude's an excellent writer. Gemini is great at research. I mean, they're all very good. They all have a tone, you know, and you can say change the tone, make this sound like, you know, whoever you want to sound like, make it sound like the New York Times, make it sound like Norman Mail or whatever you want. And it will mimic those things. Very good at that. But they all have a certain syntax. And if you're, you know, a reader or writer, you see it pretty quickly where it says either it's the one, two, three kind of syntax or You know, the M dash is the most famous, you know, that they overuse M dashes. But there's just sort of a, not only this, but also that construction. There's certain constructions that are used and just the types of headlines that are written. can tell they were written by the same kind of tone. And I don't know, I feel, I feel like people kind of feel that, you know, especially if you're talking about social media, you know, and I've seen it myself with the engagement that we get on posts and things like that, that when we write them ourselves, versus having Claude write them or AI, whatever AI write them, we get much higher engagement. So I think that even if people don't know it, it's sort of that vibe they feel it. yeah. So anyway, overall, I think it's an essential tool. I think it makes us more productive. It helps through the thinking. It's excellent at summarizing. And I think it's fantastic at that once you have a base about replicating the base and creating lots of other kinds of content. And to me, that's the essence. of making your content work harder. And that is something that has been hard for years. Like this idea of making the content work harder, that's not hard. That's not a new idea. But the actual doing of it, it's been pretty laborious to say, take that and then turn it into all these things. it's, yeah, I honestly don't think I could do my job now without my daily dose of clot.

Benjamin Ard16:59I agree. A hundred percent. I'm obsessed with Claude as well. What I love is you're starting out with like the source report is human written and I'm a big believer that AI does its best work when it has, when it either creates the first draft and humans finish it, or you feed it a real conversation, like a transcript or a human created report or something like that. And then when it repurposes, it has the human essence to it still. And I think there's a lot of value in that. So I love that you've kind of picked on the front end or the back end. How are humans going to work with this content? What I also really love about what you just said is that it really provides this amplification, but I love how you keep the humanity in all of it. You know, it's truly caring for the craft, caring for people to have. Who you are, what you say, all the stuff that you do, like have it really shine through. And I think that there's a level of quality in that, that people do appreciate. Now I have to ask with the ABCDE method and Bisquick, have you made like actual skills in Claude that it refers to on a regular basis inside your system?

Patricia McParland18:10You know, I haven't, but there is a woman on my team who has. And so she has created, and it's, I think this is excellent. She has created a skill for writing a blog in the style of our company so that anybody in the company can now write one. And that solves a problem for us, which is we were trying to get more people in the company to write blogs. So it's not all in the same voice and we can get people on our product teams, people, others to participate. So she created a skill in order to do that so that they can go in and say, I'd like to write about this, and here's the things I want to cover. And then they can use the blog skill in order to do that. yeah, myself, when it comes to Claude, I know there's these other ways to do it, like the skills and the co-working and all that. I myself am pretty much a let's torture the prompt as much as we can. So it still works pretty well. It's probably not as repeatable as it could be. And that's probably where I could maybe improve with that.

Benjamin Ard19:02There's a lot of philosophies that that is the better way as well. So it's all up for experimentation and getting what you need out of the tool.

Patricia McParland19:07Yeah, yeah, yeah. I mean, I kind of feel like we're all still learning with it, too. And when people say I'm the AI expert, I'm always a little bit like, OK, really? Because this is, I mean, you may be an AI expert in terms of AI that's been around for years. For example, when I worked at manufacturing company, I was very big into AI about 10 years ago, and advanced analytics and that sort of thing. But it's not the kind of thing we're talking about, like the generative AI. And people that I mean, how expert can you be? It's only been around for two and a half years, and it's changing all the time. So I feel like we're all kind of learning as it goes along. yeah. Sure.

Benjamin Ard19:38Yep, 100%. I agree. Well, Pat, one final question, because we like to end these episodes with tactical advice. Anyone sitting here who is a part of a content team, runs a content team, anything of the nature, and they're thinking, huh, that was really good advice. What can I do today to improve what's going on? Maybe they're overwhelmed. Maybe they just want to one up their system. Any ideas of what they can start doing to actually improve today?

Patricia McParland19:46Yes. Sure, mean, one of my favorite things to say is to go back to basics, which we started talking about today. And I think it's really easy to become enamored with tools and technology. And it happens to me too. I fell in love with Claude. I fell in love with Google many years ago. I fell in love with HubSpot, whatever. And I think it's important to take a step back and take a look beyond the technology and remember that the technology is a way to help you or tool to help you deliver the outcome. And what is the outcome that you're trying to deliver? What am I trying to do here? I think it's kind of a basic thing, but I think taking that step back of what am I asking myself? A, it's back to the ABC in a way. like, am I going for? Who is my audience, number one? What I wanna achieve and what is my outcome? What am I trying to achieve? It's very easy to lose sight of that when you're moving forward and saying, I need to accomplish all this and I need to get my, know, know, SQLs and MQLs and just rushing, you know, and not taking a step back to see the big picture. What am I really trying to do and what's my overall outcome? So that's one piece of advice. The second thing is to think about, you know, the key messages in the content. You know, that's really the foundation. That's the flour, salt, baking powder, whatever, and the Bisquick. You know, that's the found. Those are the fundamentals. And you know what? As I said, I've been doing this for more than 30 years. It's actually probably more than 35. It hasn't changed since the day I started. know, that's the same now. It's probably going to be the same, you know, 20 years from now, which I don't intend to be doing it then. But, you know, it's probably going to be the same then. You know, it's back to the basics of, you know, what is the fundamentals of, you know, what you want to do and then how you do it is really, I think, what's changing. So I guess maybe don't lose sight of what you want to do. by being caught up in the how you want to do it. And then focus, my last advice for you is, yeah, my last advice is something that I call Three Rocks. People on my teams like to make fun of me because I have like little names for everything, but Three Rocks is something I learned from another boss, which it's about focus. What are you working on? And don't tell me that you're working on 400 different things or 47 things. I need to be able to say at all times, these are my three big rocks. And my three big rocks are this program, improving my social media and this. And I wanna be able to elevate my three big things. So I think another thing is just thinking about what are your three big rocks also. I think it's another productivity kind of improvement kind of thing.

Benjamin Ard22:34I love that. And I love the message that if you're doing something and it is working, great. Maybe you need to amplify it with tools. If you're doing something and it's not working yet, it doesn't mean that a tool is gonna fix it. And I like that you shouldn't be enamored by that and all of that. Yep. Love it.

Patricia McParland22:46Not at all. No. In fact, I like to think about AI as AI could keep doing the same process that you're doing, and it could do it more effectively, but it could be a stinky process to begin with. So it's, yeah.

Benjamin Ard22:59Yep. I love that. Well, Pat, we have run out of time. Thank you so much for the insights today. This is incredible. For anyone who is listening and wants to reach out online, where can they find you?

Patricia McParland23:03Okay. Yeah, so the best place to find me is on LinkedIn. So under Pat McParland, my company name is MetricStream. And I am very active on LinkedIn. And I always like hearing from people. So if you're interested in just reaching out, chatting about anything related to marketing, AI, risk, cybersecurity, any of those things, or you just want to talk, I'm there. I really enjoy chatting with people on LinkedIn. So that's the best way.

Benjamin Ard23:35Love it. Well again, Pat, thank you again for the time and the insights. This has been incredible. Appreciate it.

Patricia McParland23:39Thank you so much for having me. I hope you go get your BISQUIC now.

Benjamin Ard23:42I know, right? I'm excited.

About the guest

Pat McParland

Pat McParland

VP of Marketing at MetricStream

Pat McParland is a lifetime B2B marketer with more than 30 years of experience, almost all of it in business information and technology. She has worked at companies ranging from startups under 30 people to giants like Dun and Bradstreet, Dow Jones, and Honeywell, and is now VP of Marketing at MetricStream, a governance, risk, and compliance company. A self-described storyteller who started reading at four and was writing books for her dad soon after, she believes the fundamentals of content have not changed in 35 years even as the tools around them have. She is an enthusiastic daily Claude user who calls the model her best friend.

Connect on LinkedIn

Continue Exploring

The Content Alignment Playbook

A practical framework for keeping marketing, sales, and customer-facing teams on the same story.

Open the playbook

Get new episodes in your inbox

Join listeners who get episode summaries, key takeaways, and content strategy insights every week.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Bisquick theory treats your messaging as a baking mix and one core asset as the batter you bake everything else from. Pat starts with a foundational asset like a survey or an annual report, calls that the Bisquick, and then makes the cookies, cakes, and muffins out of it: the infographic, the webinar, the videos, and the live event. Her central point is that content is a program, not a single piece, so the report is not finished when it ships. You are not done with the batter until every baked good is made, which is how one asset gets to work much harder.

ABCDE stands for Audience, Behavior, Content, Design, and Evaluation, and Pat is careful to note she learned it at a former company rather than inventing it. Audience is who you are talking to and what they need to know. Behavior is what you want them to feel and do. Content is the headline and three to five key messages, not the finished piece. Design is the vehicle, chosen last based on what you know about the audience. Evaluation is how you will know it worked. The discipline is running the letters in order so the format is informed by the message, instead of starting with a request to just make a video.

Pat calls AI the easy bake oven that finally brings the Bisquick theory to life, and she uses Claude every day. Once her core asset and tone are set, she prompts the model to turn one report into a blog, a social post, a CEO LinkedIn article with a C-level lens, customer-facing slides, and more, with the original tone carried through. Her content team also uses AI for grammar checking, plagiarism checking, and first drafts. But the team still writes final copy by hand, because she finds AI has a recognizable syntax and that human-written social posts earn much higher engagement.

Go back to basics. Pat's advice is to step back from the tools and ask what outcome you are actually trying to deliver and who your audience is, which is the ABC of her framework applied to your own work. Lock the key messages and fundamentals first, since in her view they have not changed in 35 years, then decide how to deliver them. She adds her Three Rocks principle for focus: be able to name your three biggest priorities at any time instead of juggling 47 things, and do not assume a tool will fix a process that is not working, because AI can run a stinky process more efficiently and it is still a stinky process.

EP 46216 min

Why your event should be the start of your content, not the finish line with Adrienne Collins

with Adrienne Collins

Most teams treat an event as a one-time moment, measure success by attendance, then move on to the next one. Adrienne Collins, an events leader with 13 years in the field, says the real opportunity is everything that happens after the doors close. In this episode she breaks down how to turn a single event into months of content: building anticipation beforehand, shifting into capture mode on site, and sequencing the footage into short videos, sales enablement, blogs, and thought leadership over time. She explains why her team replaced costly full-video breakout recordings with audio plus transcripts and an on-site testimonial studio at a fourth of the cost, and walks through her capture, package, distribute, and measure framework for aligning content to the buyer journey. If your events end the moment the doors close, this conversation gives you the system to keep them working for months.

June 3, 2026Listen
EP 46618 min

Why unpolished, trust-based content is beating AI-perfect content with Jonathan Murray

with Jonathan Murray

Someone gets in a car accident, Googles a lawyer, and lands on a site that reads like a resume. They are already gone. In this Content Amplified episode, Jonathan Murray, Marketing Director at Legends Legal Marketing, explains why trust-based content is winning right now and why polished, AI-perfect content is starting to repel the people it is meant to attract. Jonathan unpacks his core idea that your client is the movie star and you are the supporting cast, the difference between a site that lists your accolades and one that speaks to what the client is feeling, and why ego is the thing that holds most business owners back. He gets specific: the photo shoot that swaps the tie-at-the-desk shot for sleeves rolled up on the farm, why your colleagues are not your clients, the Gary Vee talking-head comparison, his rule to keep content unpolished 70% of the time, and treating AI like an editor-in-chief you trust but verify. If you want your content to sound like a person instead of a bot, this conversation tells you how.

June 10, 2026Listen
EP 46317 min

Why AI outputs don't equal a content strategy with Adam Haskew

with Adam Haskew

Producing more content faster is not the same as producing content that matters. In this episode of Content Amplified, Adam Haskew, Associate Director of Brand Experience at Redis, argues that AI accelerates your outputs but does nothing for your strategy, and that the gap between the two is where AI slop gets made. Adam breaks down the fix most fast-moving teams skip: kickoff calls, a complete brief, and human alignment at the very start of a project, before a single word is generated. He explains why skipping that step creates a snowball effect downstream, how about an hour and a half of upfront communication removes most of the noise, and why he runs a brand voice review agent at Redis that every piece of content has to pass through before it ships.

June 4, 2026Listen

Get new episodes in your inbox

Join listeners who get episode summaries, key takeaways, and content strategy insights every week.